Dnia 04-03-2007, nie o godzinie 15:00 +0100, Enrico Scholz napisał(a): > > There are some security considerations with runlevel 1. > Either it is a "Recovery Console", or it is not a "Recovery Console". There already was a brief discussion about adding a small rescue filesystem in /boot, which would be better than running "single" AKA runlevel 1. This would be the true recovery console, operational even when the shell from our "real" fs doesn't even start (because some mor^H^H^HESR^H^H^Huser removed shared libraries). Where did this idea go? Lam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= listu podpisana cyfrowo
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
