Re: umask in rpm scriptlets - yes or no?

[Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Does anybody know whether anything has been decided on setting an
> explicit "umask 022" at the beginning of scriptlets?

I don't know the example of 022, however for 133 I know
a example.
--------------------------------------------------------
[tasaka1@localhost i386]$ rpm -q --scripts fonts-japanese
postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
{
    umask 133
    touch /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType 2> /dev/null && {
        /usr/bin/ttmkfdir -d /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType -o 
/usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType/fonts.scale
        mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType
        /usr/sbin/chkfontpath -q -a /usr/share/fonts/japanese/TrueType
    }
    mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc && /usr/sbin/chkfontpath -q -a 
/usr/share/fonts/japanese/misc
    if [ -x /usr/bin/fc-cache ]; then
        /usr/bin/fc-cache /usr/share/fonts
    fi
}
postuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh):
<snip>
--------------------------------------------------------

Mamoru

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list