On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 19:54 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Dnia 01-03-2007, czw o godzinie 12:49 -0500, Adam Jackson napisał(a): > > You say this as though there were only one X server memory leak. > > > > Or as though you had a working testcase. > > > > Or as though it were actually X's fault instead of some boneheaded > > application you happen to be running. > [..] > > Run any gecko application (firefox, galeon, epiphany) and open page with > short refresh time (I have usualy openned page with system monitoring > like mrtg or zabbix) and start observe groving X server memory > consumption. That's Gecko, not the X server. It has pretty aggressive image caching and stores the pixmaps on the server, not in its own memory. If you shut down that process and the X server returns to something sane it's not an X leak. (It's even arguable that if it doesn't shrink it's still not an X leak but is a fragmented allocator, but that's another discussion.) --Chris -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
