Neal Becker wrote: > Jonathan Underwood wrote: > >> On 01/03/07, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I notice that Jindrich Novy (tetex packages maintainer) is away until >>> 27th March. Jindrich had previously mentioned his intention to move to >>> TeXLive for F7, due to tetex being unmaintained and quite out of date. >>> Is this still the intention? It would be useful to know from both a >>> user and packager perspective if there's any kind of roadmap in place >>> for this? >> Actually, I notice Jindrich has filed review request bugs for texlive >> packages - BZ 229180 and 229182, and this wiki page details his plans >> etc: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureTexLive >> > > I'm playing around with trying to build/install these packages on fc6. > > I wonder if the texlive packages should provide the corresponding tetex > packages? Otherwise, it seems that a lot of packages that require TeX are > going to break. Upgrade paths are certainly an issue that should be addressed in the package review. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
