Le jeudi 01 mars 2007 à 09:29 +1000, Jens Petersen a écrit : > Hi, > > Thanks for the followup. No charge ;) > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > To be honest I'm not too fond of foo-font packages. > > Sorry, did you mean "fonts-*"? Right, sorry > I agree with you for fonts for Western languages for which it is > possible to have reasonable coverage with limited resources. A general font like DejaVu does lao, arabic (better support is waiting on better opentype support pango & qt-side) aboriginal canadian syllabics, armenian, greek, cyrillic so I don't think the "western only" qualifier applies. You just need to get people to work together, doing a whole unicode block is no harder within an unicode font than within a specific font (in fact it's easier since you don't have to redo latin like all the asian fonts do now) > > IMHO (which if worth what it's worth) you're not packaging generic fonts > > for tibetan but a specific font project, and it deserves name recognition > > just like any other upstream. So upstreamname-fonts seems more respectful > > for me. Also have you though of what will happen should someone want to > > package another tibetan font in a few months ? > > Well in the review we are actually now discussing putting two GPL > Tibetan fonts in the same package if it is going by the generic language > name. That's the logical next step. It feels like putting kmail and evolution in the same "MUA" package though. Can't you get by with a "Tibetan support" comps group instead ? I will work with font packages crossing langage boundaries, not force users to install every single font for one langage (and in CJK countries that weights quite a lot), allow you to follow two separate upstream release schedules, etc. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
