Matt Domsch wrote :
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Florian La Roche wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> > > Florian La Roche wrote :
> > >
> > > > > This is neat, and ultimately quite useful. Would somebody be willing to
> > > > > try this with Extras too? (I guess "everything" will be a bit more
> > > > > difficult because of more explicit conflicts)
> > > >
> > > > We can run this test again in 2 or 3 weeks to see how F7 looks like
> > > > and then also add the FE packages to what we currently call a
> > > > "full FC" chroot.
> > >
> > > It would be a good idea, since I'm pretty sure interesting results
> > > will pop-up, especially some ("used to be") Core packages being able to
> > > include some optional functionality provided by ("used to be") Extras
> > > packages... some of which we might even want/like to have.
> >
> > Other possibility is that maybe Matt Domsch could also pick this
> > up for his rebuild scripts? Matt, ??
>
> They already do. :-)
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-core/i386/00-rpmdiff-added-or-removed.txt
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-core/x86_64/00-rpmdiff-added-or-removed.txt
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-extras/i386/00-rpmdiff-added-or-removed.txt
> http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/fixbuildrequires/mock-results-extras/x86_64/00-rpmdiff-added-or-removed.txt
s/fixbuildrequires/FixBuildRequires/
Wow! It uncovers SO MANY BUGS!!! Many noarch python packages ending up
using the sitearch dir when rebuilt on x86_64, for instance.
It would really be interesting going through most of these.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.19-1.2895.fc6
Load : 1.15 1.11 0.73
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
