Verily I say unto thee, that Arthur Pemberton spake thusly: > On 2/22/07, Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: >> >> Fedora, you had every advantage >> > >> > Except a financial one, apparently. >> > >> >> I'm somewhat confused by your statement - what lack of financial >> do you see in Fedora? Red Hat is one of the primary financial sponsors >> of the Fedora Project; even so far as to have many of its [Fedora's] >> primary developers on its [Red Hat's] payroll. >> >> Please clarify this for me. Thanks. > > I could be just in a bad mood, or simply wrong....but I believe he > meant financial advantage for the OP / complainer. Correct. Oh and I'm probably wrong too, and in a bad mood. -- K. http://slated.org - Slated, Rated & Blogged .---- | "Future archaeologists will be able to identify a 'Vista Upgrade | Layer' when they go through our landfill sites" - Sian Berry, the | Green Party. `---- Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.19-1.2288.fc5 17:39:59 up 3 days, 5:05, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
