On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:47 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:09 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:44 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 10:24 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:22 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 05:51 -0500, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Updated Packages: > > > > > > > > > > > libdrm-2.3.0-4.fc7 > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > * Mon Feb 19 2007 Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> 2.3.0-4 > > > > > > - Update nouveau patch > > > > > > - Fix License tag and other rpmlint noise > > > > > > > > > > OT question (that might not be related...) > > > > > Any idea when the latest DRI drivers (especially, mach64 and nv) will > > > > > imported into the kernel tree? > > > > > > > > nv already is, though I might be a bit behind. > > > > > > > > If there are significant mach64 changes since the last time Dave Airlie > > > > pushed stuff upstream, it's news to me, but I admit to not watching > > > > mach64 development very closely. > > > > > > I should clarify. The DRM is pretty close to current, afaik. Mesa is > > > behindish; not sure what the right thing to do there is. > > > > > > - ajax > > > > > > > Would the latest Mesa/DRM combo will find it's way into F7? > > The question is how much breakage people are willing to put up with. > Mesa doesn't release very often, and has a lot of churn. While I > certainly _can_ start doing snapshots... > > That said I'm looking at some Mesa stuff this week, so hopefully I'll > get a better idea of how stable head is right now. > > - ajax > Thanks. - Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
