On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:19 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 15 February 2007 08:03, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Give me one reason why I should trust you more than anybody else. > > Because the source to the application/server we're talking about is opensource > and available for you to review and form your own conclusions. Which you > should do, instead of continually spreading FUD. Yes, let's please put this thread to rest. Any users/administrators have at least three junctures at which they can block smolt on their system, and can take advantage of any of them: 1. Don't install it; use a kickstart file that removes smolt from the installation, or make a custom repo without it. 2. Disable the firstboot module by twiddling around with the bits in the %post section. 3. When smolt asks you if you want to send any information, choose the default NO action. Ralf, you are trying to assert opinions about the law without any credentials, and about the code apparently without having looked at it. Your concerns have been noted and will be give due consideration. Time to move on. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
