On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 03:37 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:32 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 02:19 +0000, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > > > On 2/16/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 02:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > I don't think you've ever said how the information is being sent > > > without user permission or what the personal data is that is being > > > sent. > > > The smolt developers would be the ones to reply this. > The smolt developers and the smolt code HAS replied to this. Yes, but this thread started with "Shall smolt be installed by default", so the question wasn't "opt-in/opt-out", it was "installed by default" I expressed my opinion and said: No, ... Arthur's was "how" - I said "http:" and "what" Ralf
I think "installed by default" here means that the Smolt code will be on the install media and copied to the hard drive by default (if even that much) - installing sends no data - the user has to choose to run it. hence the "opt-in" . The discussion on opt-in/out ended long ago. -- Fedora Core 6 and proud -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
