On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:15 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 02:33 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 08:20 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > Ask yourself: If you were an administration/government/military > > > organisation, an enterprise's financial/development department, a bank, > > > simply a shop archiving your customer data or other entity dealing with > > > "secret"/"private" information, would you want details about your > > > systems to be exposed to the public? > > > > > > Consider secret services/competitors spying the net, consider > > > man-in-the-middle attacks, consider intruders harvesting the > > > database, ... > > > > > > I would not - I would take any measure to prevent and obsure such > > > transmission. > > > > Thats fine. In that case you can simply instruct your users to not send > > such information and the users can simply just click 'next' on the menu. > Many folks around here would advise their management to classify Fedora > as not trustworthy and to ban it :-o. > > Is exactly the kind of argumentation why before-mentioned institutions > chose to migrate away from Microsoft systems. but that's not a legal issue. You said you had a legal concern with including smolt and this is not a legal issue at all. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
