On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 06:58 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 00:34 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 05:48 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:59 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > So smolt is still setup in firstboot and still is opt in. My question > > > > is do we want to install smolt as part of a default configuration with > > > > F7. My vote is yes. > > > > > > My vote is no. > > > > > > > > * is legally questionable. > > > > If you have a concern here, please file a bug on it and I will make sure > > it gets passed into the legal queue for evaluation. > > Everything that needed to be said had been communicated to Mr. McGrath. > It's up to him to decide on what to do with it. > > > Please list the > > country where you think the law might be violated. > Probably most parts of the world outside of the US, definitely in > Europe, definitely in Germany, probably also in some part of Asia. > > Besides this, you should understand that data-privacy plays a much more > important role than what you are used to in many countries and > communities - As I already said: You are playing with a loaded gun, > right in front of your face. > > Here in Germany, many folks consider any such transition from user to > vendor as "hostile espionage". Press is full of articles flaming > manufactures for this and related topics. > > It will definitely be reason for users not to choose Fedora in future > (It might have escaped you, but Microsoft and other vendors having done > the similar is the reason why many users choose to switch to Linux). No need for such a screed. I wasn't arguing with you. I was simply volunteering to take the issues through the board to legal to get them addressed. I'll talk to Mike and make sure I have a firm handle on your concerns so I can make sure they are represented. Thanks, -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
