On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 13:59 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 13:47 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > Leszek Matok wrote: > > > Dnia 14-02-2007, śro o godzinie 19:01 +0100, David Nielsen napisał(a): > > > > > >> Smolt is doubleplus good, I vote yes. > > >> > > > I don't know nice 1984-ish word for "not so good", but: > > > > > > Can Smolt work from behind a proxy server, faking the User-Agent? > > > Because, you know, I've tried to register some machines from a real > > > production environment, with no luck. setenv http_proxy doesn't work, > > > probably because our proxy rejects most of UA-s (or because Smolt > > > doesn't honor http_proxy at all). > > > > This is a must, I'll contact you as soon as its ready. > > Setting http_proxy should work - I've tested that before. If your proxy > blocks unusual User-Agent strings that may be more difficult to deal > with - I'm not sure how easy it is to configure urlgrabber to use a > different User-Agent string. > for MOST proxies. Some Microsoft-based proxies like to make kittens suffer. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
