On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:29:13 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 22:27 -0600, Jima wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Curtis Doty wrote: > > > 8:16pm Michael Schwendt said: > > >> Meanwhile, all automatically found multi-lib conflicts have been reported > > >> in bugzilla. Only six in Core, 4-5 dozen in Extras (-> FE7Target tracker). > > > > > > URL or help please. For those of us who wish to contribute, but don't > > > already have an advanced degree in the slow and morose beast known as Red > > > Hat Bugzilla. :-/ > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=FE7Target > > > > Not sure which blocking bugs are the multilib conflicts, though. > > Try the dependency tree view instead, which lists the summaries: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE7Target > > Paul. Interesting are the cases where -devel packages (sometimes tiny ones for plug-in APIs) cause main 32-bit application packages to be pulled into the x86_64 repo, which then conflicts in data files (in a few cases due to packaging bugs). Splitting off a -libs package (for the corresponding files in the -devel package) should be possible in most cases, especially since we don't really want 32-bit applications in the 64-bit repo. As a last resort, there's still the multi-lib blacklist. ... and the additional Core tickets are these: 228311 (FIXED) 228315 228317 228318 228320 (FIXED) 228321 (MODIFIED via Merge review) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
