On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:37 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 07:02 -0500, Max Spevack wrote: > > 3) Internal RH developers who don't pay much attention to Fedora at all, > > aside from what they are "forced" to do. > > I can't speak for what trouble or drama this may cause within Red Hat, Right, this is Red Hat management problem. They will have to decide on what to do and we, the community will have to watch for what will happen. > but from the community's point of view, we're much better off if this > kind of people are encouraged to just let go of whatever packages > they're not interested in maintaining to someone who has an honest > interest in them. I'd rather not see this happening, firstly, because this won't always be applicable (technical complexity) and in second place, because this it is a double-sided sword (outsourcing). I'd prefer RH'd devs to start opening their packages and collaborate with the community on their packages - IMO, both sides can only mutually benefit from this in longer terms. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
