On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:53:40PM -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On 2/7/07, Lamont Peterson <lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Wednesday 07 February 2007 01:27pm, Daniel Yek wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It was a while ago when I read that NFS was difficult to secure with (the > >> use of) ssh and iptables (or something like that). > >> > >> I really needed an alternative that works and can be made secure. Is GFS > >a > >> suitable replacement for NFS? If not, what is the closest thing to NFS? > > > >Kerberized NFS, preferably NFS4. > > > It sounds like there are those of you who actually get NFS4 to work. I > have tried twice on FC6, and have yet to succeed myself, just gave up > and used NFS3. I opened a thread on the general mailing list about it > but got no real help. I am running NFS4 with kerberos since FC5 (maybe even earlier) with only minor problems here and there. There is a problem with krb5 since 2.6.18 that prevents multiple mounts (bugzilla #218330) in FC5/6 so you might have some problems. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
