2007/1/27, jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:04:39PM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: > So, what it the rationale for /etc/init.d not being in the default > $PATH, for root at least? > I've never had to execute anything directly in /etc/init.d/ -- there is the "service" command that runs those files for me, at least in fedora. you can always modify $PATH by dropping a file into /etc/profile.d/ if you *really* want this sort of thing to be possible. I would not want to see it in fedora though.
It'll be nice if command-completion in bash and zsh can provide the list of available services .. otherwise, using zsh, there are ease-of-use arguments for having init.d in $PATH -- Michel Salim http://hircus.wordpress.com/ My theology, briefly, is that the universe was dictated but not signed. -- Christopher Morley -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
