Re: Fedora Server Spin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:57:09AM +0100, Dawid Gajownik wrote:
 > Dnia 01/12/2007 12:33 AM, Użytkownik David Lutterkort napisał:
 > > Anybody interested in Fedora Server should have a look at the package
 > > list and let me know if they think a package should be classified
 > > differently
 > 
 > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraServer/Packages
 > 
 > I would put athcool in Exclude group. It's rather a hack for older AMD 
 > processors without PowerNOW!/Cool'n'Quiet technology.
 > http://members.jcom.home.ne.jp/jacobi/linux/softwares.html#athcool
 > 
 > Well, I use it all the time but I don't think that it's suitable for 
 > server version.

It's also proven to cause system instability on some systems, so definitly
not something to consider for a default install of any class.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux