Re: experimental boost-1.34.0-0.5 rpms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




OOo is a fairly extensive user of boost FWIW, a test rebuild of the last
pushed rawhide OOo (for a fast smoketest undef langpacks in the .spec)
would likely shake out any common problems.

Thanks. However, the boost library naming/renaming issue is something that I'd only like to do once: there's no point in changing up things and then reverting.

For instance, the libboost_thread.so -> libboost_thread-mt.so change has already tripped up my monotone build smoketest.

:(

-benjamin

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux