Re: FC7-TARGET tracker and appropriate usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Michel Salim" <michel.salim@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I added both update requests to the FC7Target tracker (bz# 150225).
> Right now it seems that there are only two main trackers: blocker and
> target. Would it be a good idea to start a third tracker for upgrade
> requests? The bugs I filed that I have in mind for this tracker are
> generally easy to close, and in one case (f-spot) there are even
> updated specs on the Bugzilla ticket.
>
> If someone thinks this is a good idea I can create the tracker and
> perhaps make it block FC7Target.

There's still a zsh in rawhide which is broken for all non-english
users using UTF-8 locales. For me this is definitely a blocker bug,
fixing it would just require an update to latest upstream release.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=183557

-- 
Did you ever realize how much text fits in eighty columns? If you now consider
that a signature usually consists of up to four lines, this gives you enough
space to spread a tremendous amount of information with your messages. So seize
this opportunity and don't waste your signature with bullshit nobody will read.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux