Re: New VCS Choice; SCM SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:01 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Kristian Høgsberg <krh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >
> > However, I don't know of any consensus towards hg.  I know that Jesse wasn't
> > impressed when he did the dist-git prototype, but I think he judged it too
> > quickly.
> 
> Almost NO ONE bothered to actually aid Jesse in his evaluation of the
> various SCM's.  I didn't have a single email from anyone regarding the
> SVN repo I set up for eval.  This decision is getting made by the
> people participating, not by those talking about it.

This needs a tiny bit of clarifying.  We do need to be looking at what
the consumers of the SCM want.  Of course if none of the consumers give
us feedback we can implement whatever we want :-)

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux