On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 14:20 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > Part of the problem is that for our purposes, CVS really seems to work > well enough. Sure, it's not great, but really it's not the thing > people complain about. Exactly. I think it's premature to be talking about whether git is better than hg or how stinky cvs really is. We need to define what we want to achieve by moving to something else. What new workflow do we want to enable? Do we want to prioritize cooperation with upstreams? Do we want people to have private branches? That can build to sandboxes? What pie-in-the-sky can you come up with that the package SCM can do for us? Then we can come up with ways to implement them in the various SCMs. Without knowing what our priorities are, we'll forever know that our present system "works" and any one of five new systems could be "better". -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
