On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 12:20 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Tuesday 23 January 2007 12:04, Callum Lerwick wrote: > > Have they actually talked to anyone in Fedora about this yet? > First ive heard of it so i doubt they have talked with anyone. if they had it > would have come up before now. The FAQ claims they have, in the usual manner of corporate secrecy. If true, let the flames begin. > cnr.com makes it look like they plan to add extra stuff to what in Fedora > already . http://www.cnr.com/screenshots.html shows how they say it will > work. > > > If they're usurping our packages and repos, then we have a problem... > That could be a very big problem. Hmmm, the last image, plus the bullet point of having server farms with phat pipes in the FAQ, says they *do* in fact intend to completely bypass our mirrors, repos *and* yum. Not good. Will their tool be checking for our package signatures?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
