Le Mar 23 janvier 2007 15:00, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > So, all in all, you should better make all these VCS stuff entirely > transparent (Implement applications around it), or you'd better off > using something standardized, ... which ATM, would reduce the choice to > svn or CVS. A lot of big projects (Linux, Xorg, Java VM, etc) are moving either to git or hg today. hg/git are not "exotic", bazar/svn increasingly are (git/hg are really the same choice as they're very similar fonctionnality-wise) You have the following history A. CVS sucks, but everybody but Linus uses it B. lots of next-gen FLOSS VCS projects created after Linus starts using bk. Two philosophies : slightly better CVS (SVN), radical new experimental designs C. ... a few projects choose SVN as a better CVS. Experimental scares people D. Linus dumps bk, looks are next-gen VCSes, decides to write git. hg announced at about the same time, with similar design E. Public use of git and hg by big projects inspire confidence. New projects go A->D or nothing->D. C starts loosing momentum fast. B never took of SVN was last year's good choice. CVS was last decade bad default. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
