Le Mar 23 janvier 2007 14:12, Josh Boyer a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 07:44 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> > > >> > cvs doesn't separate the concept of tags and branches. >> Right, this bloats the repos sizes on the server (svn pushes this bloat >> to the clients) and renders "branch removal" a pain on the server. >> >> > It also works on >> > individual files rather than whole trees. >> Right, but I don't see this as a disadvantage. It's a different working >> principle. > > This is actually what I hate most about CVS. It doesn't have the > concept of changesets. So you can commit a bunch of files at once, that > logically should be considered as one change and have a single file fail > to commit because of a conflict while the rest go into the repo. That's why cvs-import is insanely great /me runs -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
