>>>>> "CA" == Chuck Anderson <cra@xxxxxxx> writes: CA> The problem is that the rt2x00 driver assumes that there is an API CA> difference between kernels < 2.6.20 and >= 2.6.20. I understand that. What I don't understand is what Fedora is supposedly doing wrong. It's not uncommon to see various people denigrating Fedora because it supposedly does something improper and breaks some piece of software. Generally this is because of the fast pace of development and because Fedora tends to pick up new bits like kernels and gcc releases before other distros. But occasionally you see the blather that was in the previously linked forum thread, where Fedora is denigrated for doing something, but nobody bothers to indicate just what it is doing or why it is wrong. I gather that someone wants the FC6 kernel to somehow identify itself as 2.6.20, even though it's not 2.6.20. It's a reasonable point of discussion when the topic is the release candidates, but here we're talking about 2.6.19 + bugfixes. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
