It is a bit late in the cycle, but how about inclusion of the packages in the repository as a secondary method. It could then easily (barring no issues) probably be made the primary method around FC 8 time frame. On 1/20/07, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 17:47 -0600, Jerone Young wrote: > I was wondering how everyone felt about the possibility of including > Grub 2 in FC7. While it still is in development, it is very much > functional and does currently work. This would have the potential to > allow unification of boot loaders across all architecture (PPC & EFI > Intel boxes come to mind). This may also kick start development on > Grub 2, so it's not under development forever. The downfall though is > that it does use a new file format & tools would need to be modified > to support it. What does everyone else think? IMHO, it's entirely too late in the cycle to introduce something like this. Especially for all arches. I'm sure pjones has a much stronger opinion. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
