I would say keep 'proactive' support as it is, (Test 2 of Fn+2), but at the same time do not remove the older distro from the Fedora infrastructure for a little longer, allowing 'reactive' updates by packagers who care. It has been mentioned by one individual it would be easier on a single system to update packages than it was by havign two separate systems. Maybe this would give the impetus needed? Only remove the distro after a minimum of around 18 months, but make it clear that after around 13 months it is no longer proactively maintained. Ofcourse this will still leave issues over who will maintain major packages such as the kernel, which presumably require alot of work, since the current maintainers would have moved on. PS I myself am against having one version as LTS. To me it means it is better/more stable than the versions immediately before and after it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
