On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 08:59 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tuesday 16 January 2007 05:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > As I tried to express many times before, to me, FL has always been a > > dead-born child which never actually came into real existance > > And you did so much to help the project out. Why should I? I have expressed my attitude on a "separate legacy" many times before: It's a matter of effectiveness. Unlike contributing to a separate Legacy or 3rd party repo, as contributor to FE, extending a package's life-time as part of FE, had not meant much (almost none) additional effort to me. Therefore, I was able to keep my FE packages up-to-date for FE3/F4 (within the boundaries RH set by having discontinued FC3/FC4) until some divine instance had decided to close their buildsystems down. The poor victim is the user. In other words: Contributing to a separate Legacy Project means unnecessarily wasting resources to contributors at least some FE contributors could provide at almost no personal costs. Therefore I had been expecting "Fedora Legacy" not to be success from the very beginning. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
