-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 14.01.2007 20:43 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > At least FC6 will then be at the middle of it's lifespan then and sill > have round about 7 months to live. Do we really want to backport > security fixes during all that time? I thought we have a lot to do > already. Sure, those security fixes will be produced for RHEL5 in any > case, but it that really worth the trouble building and testing them for > Fedora? > IMHO backporting security patches from 2.x to 1.5.x.y conflicts with fedora's philosophy of beeing bleeding edge. So I think that there only two real alternatives: - - Updating the Firefox of Fedora Core 5 & 6 to version 2.0.x.y. - - Updating the Firefox of Fedora Core 5 & 6 to a non final version of Firefox 3 with all the risks of a non final version. Personally I'd prever to update firefox to version 2.0.x.y until version 3 final is released. Regards, Heiko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFqqNgFs/JPNR65YARAtGcAKCuxp+65yD3TG4Px6lKaYIApasTRQCcCVnp FT8H9KQjJxLYvdfxZJBg2SY= =/xlh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
