Sex, 2007-01-12 às 18:32 +0000, David Lutterkort escreveu: > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 11:01 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > okay - a convincing argument was made to me for some amount of items for > > i18n. So non-western-language-speaking folks can use the server install. > > Just to be clear: 'some amount of items for i18n' means X, right ? This > is fine for interactive installs, as long as we don't unnecessarily > require X (especially server and drivers) for kickstarts and text-mode > installs. > > > However, I think a server install's comps.xml is the perfect place for > > an @ultra-minimal which is narrow and controlled if only to save the one > > step a good admin will have to do anyway, which is removing all the > > unnecessary items from a server install. > > And part of this exercise is to give people a good starting point for > what's unnecessary etc. What's on your hit list for scrubbing server > installs ? Do you @redhat.com guys ever had to handle Visa 3DSecure or PCI:DSS audit programs? I do, at my line of work. The definition of "base" installs is far more permissive than it should, and it hasn't really improved. Far more... my kickstarts specify base and many dozens of -foo package *unselections*. I can provide you with one such kickstart (minus ip addresses and some portions of the post-install scripts) if you want, and there's still some work to do post-boot that I've been too lazy (in the bad sense) to find a generic form to include in the kickstart template. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
