Bill Nottingham schrieb: > Pete Zaitcev (zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >>> * fedora-devel -- For devel discussion. The "old" fedora-devel-list >>> became quite noise and we want to avoid that with the new list. Thus the >>> plan is to restrict it to well known open-source or project contributors >>> and make it moderated for the rest of the world. Support questions >>> regarding devel stuff are off topic here. >> I question the assertion behind this. Fedora-devel-list is rather >> quiet, considering the size of the project. >>> * fedora-devel-discuss -- We need an open devel list for users as >>> fedora-devel is restricted. Support questions regarding devel stuff are >>> on topic here, too. >> Very dubious idea, but ok. >> My main problem with this proposal is that you're trying to recreate >> the current system of fedora-maintainers and fedora-devel-list >> with no change at all. > This is my concern as well - I'd rather just repurpose as: > -maintainers: Announcements (freezes, policy changes, outages, etc.), and > related followup discussion. > -devel: devel discussions. My concern is that in above scenario the "related followup discussion" are on a closed list then where even well known open-source contributors can't participate. And it might happen that the same things get discussed on -devel an -maintainers at the same time. CU thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list