Re: Fedora Core 7 - Compiz vs Beryl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 04 January 2007 9:27 pm, Otto Rey wrote:
> What do you think about to replace Compiz with Beryl, and merge "Desktop
> Effects" with "Beryl Manager" in FC7?
>
> My vote: +1
>
> Otto Rey

So far this thread appears to have focused on the configuration of beryl 
versus compiz plus packaging. These are important of course but what about 
performance ? 

Just to add my experience of running both, I have found compiz much better. I 
have an nvidia go 5640 with 128M. compiz runs perfectly smoothly, the effects 
look great and don't slow things down. With beryl, the effects are more jerky 
and no where near as smooth. 

Reading around the mailing lists I also understand that beryl is not as well 
implemented as compiz. It requires two pixmaps per client window whereas 
compiz only needs one (someone please correct me here if I am wrong). So it 
simply uses more video ram to do the same things.

So please, can we also bring performance into the discussion. From my 
experiences beryl is not yet ready to replace compiz, but maybe others have 
different experiences. I for one would like to see both beryl and compiz 
being kept available, just to see how both projects pan out.

Chris

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux