David Lutterkort <dlutter <at> redhat.com> writes: > Anybody interested in Fedora Server should have a look at the package > list and let me know if they think a package should be classified > differently; for the Maybe group, I'd appreciate comments on whether the > packages should be included or not (e.g., should FSS support dynamic DNS > and include the various clients for dyndns.org etc. ?) Would be great to put horde, imp and friends on the list too (i.e. webmail essentials :-). -- Bojan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
