Horst H. von Brand wrote:
- Be consistent
(I first sent this directly to Thorsten, but as the discussion is still
going on here, I resend it to this thread).
I prefer the list name to reflect _who_ the list is for, not _what_ is
happening on the list. And I think this should be consistent.
An exception to this rule is '-announce' lists that is ment solely for
announcements, so no discussions should happen there.
So in my opinion we should have something like
- fedora-users
- fedora-devel-users
- fedora-developers
- fedora-maintainers
- fedora-advisory-board
- fedora-qa
- fedora-cvs-announce
- fedora-maintainers-announce
"fedora-maintainers" is my suggestion for the list you have named
"fedora-project", as I think it is less chance that it will be confused
with "fedora-users" with that name.
"fedora-maintainers-announce" should then be used by the maintainers to
annouce what they have decided for the future based on the discussions
on "fedora-maintainers".
For fedora-hardware/fedora-laptop I think most discussions should happen
in fedora-devel-users and fedora-users. If we really want a list for
hardware discussions it should be named something like
"fedora-hardware-testers" as I guess most discussion would be about
hardware that needs testing, not about hardware that is known to work or
more general "what is best, Nvidia or ATI?"-discussions.
I believe this will make it more obvious what lists one would want to
subscribe to.
Rgds.
--
_,--', _._.--._____
.--.--';_'-.', ";_ _.,-' Ola Thoresen
.'--'. _.' {`'-;_ .-.>.'
'-:_ ) / `' '=. It is easier to fix Unix
) > {_/, /~) than to live with Windows
|/ `^ .'
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
