Le Mar 9 janvier 2007 17:02, Jeffrey C. Ollie a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 16:35 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> Le Mar 9 janvier 2007 16:00, Jeffrey C. Ollie a écrit : >> >> > If you look a the kernel .spec you will see that there is >> > "linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2" plus "patch-2.6.20-rc4.bz2". So the RPM >> version >> > is reflecting the fact that it's the 2.6.19 plus patches. >> >> I suppose >> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.18.tar.bz2 >> + >> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.19.bz2 >> >> is 2.6.18 + patches too then? > > Yes, if the .spec was structured that way. But I bet that the RH kernel > guys would just switch to the full 2.6.29 tarball. But you can't switch > to a kernel release candidate tarball because there aren't any that I > know of. ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.20-rc4.tar.bz2 (Just to disprove this argument, you could push it a tad further and suggest to distinguish between .tar.bz2, tar.gz & zip source archives in rpm versions) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
