man, 08 01 2007 kl. 15:13 -0500, skrev Mark Heslep: > Naoki wrote: > > Compiz is the upstream original, Beryl is a fork. > > > > Compiz uses gconf which is pretty standard and works well with gnome > > obviously, Beryl uses flat file. > > > > Beryl has (had?) some additional plugins, but plugins are being written > > for compiz all the time as well, look at compiz-extras. > > > > Beryl has a theme manager, compiz uses cairo, metacity, or KDE themes. > > > > They look the same to me but Compiz just seems to be the better > > integrated of the two. > > > > > > > Add: > Beryl supports dual head xinerama properly. > Compiz does not. > > Compiz is preferred here otherwise, but no dual head is a show stopper. > > Mark Beryl supports this via a nasty hack as I'm to understand. Dave Reveman opposed including it in Compiz as he was working on a non-hack solution, which is present in the development version of Compiz (currently available in your Fedora Development repo and thus in F7). Ergo, a complete non-issue unless you have bugzilla entries to show me wrong? - David Nielsen -- "Ridicule is the only weapon that can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them.” -Thomas Jefferson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
