On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 09:02 -0800, alan wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Peter Gordon wrote: > > That configurability comes at the cost of a disastrous UI and many cases > > of Not-Invented-Here syndrome (using flat files for storage instead of > > GConf, using its own themes instead of those of Metacity/Cairo/GTK, et. > > al). That, and the fact that the people of Beryl is purportedly much > > less strict about the quality and consistency of code accepted. > > I am not certain why gconf is a "better" solution. It makes moving users > from one version to another difficult. (More than once, I have had all > the configuration data tied up in the gconf blob. Not easy to say "pull > all the configuation for app x".) Gconf is just repeating the mistakes of > the Windows registry without the extra obfuscation of uid keys. > What do you mean by "pull all the configuration for app x"? If you mean tell me what is the configuration, try either of the following: gconftool-2 -R '/apps/gnotime' gconftool-2 --dump '/apps/gnotime' If you mean, get rid of your customizations, try: gconftool-2 --recursive-unset '/apps/gnotime' -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
