Rex Dieter schrieb: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 04.01.2007 22:22, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> It would be consistent to have something like >>> Fedora Desktop (GNOME edition) and >>> Fedora Desktop (KDE edition) >>> It's confusing and discriminatory to call one of the spins as the >>> desktop when you have more (which is likely to increase) than one >>> desktop oriented spins. >> +1 from me to this as a long term Gnome user that's not much interested >> in KDE; but I know others are. >> >> This issue brings up a interesting question: Which board has the power >> to influence and adjust this particular naming scheme in our new >> "merged" world? FESCo or the Fedora Board? > Sounds like the consensus (so far) is the Board. BTW, in case it wasn't clear from my other mails: I actually agree that the Boards is the best place for this sort of decision, as it's more a political "big picture" thing. Nevertheless I think it's FESCo (or better: it not yet defined successor) job to work out the details (maybe in a FESCo-distribution-sub-committee) and present it to the Boards to get an ACK from it. > You can now count 2 Board > members (Rahul and me) for being in favor of this. (: thx. Cu thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
