Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:54 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:28:48AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
http://live.gnome.org/NetworkManagerConfiguration
>>
Hmmm, looks like this kind of definition is going to have a hard time
working in real setups. Lemme give you some examples of what I use on
a regular basis:
Which is why it's good to have feedback :) So at least the 'gateway'
item needs to be re-thought, since that's route-based and not
interface/connection specific underneath. Though to many users it
appears so, because they do not have complex setups, the flexibility
needs to be there underneath.
It is at least important to be able to add multiple addresses to one
(physical) interface.
I personally don't like the old eth0:0 eth0:1 (...), but prefer the new
iproute2 style, but I guess I can live with aliases as long as it is
easy to add/remove them.
Rgds.
--
_,--', _._.--._____
.--.--';_'-.', ";_ _.,-' Ola Thoresen
.'--'. _.' {`'-;_ .-.>.'
'-:_ ) / `' '=. It is easier to fix Unix
) > {_/, /~) than to live with Windows
|/ `^ .'
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
