Re: Fedora 7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This is going to sound really stupid but what the heck; The nice thing
> about the "core" and "extras" differentiation was you knew what was
> "core" and what was "extra".
>
<snip>
> Also, how will this help the creation of RHEL?  If Fedora is to remain
> the basis for RHEL will this not slightly confuse things?

Why is this a concern for Fedora?  It's not.  It's something Red Hat
will have to figure out.  Though I doubt it will be very hard for them
to do so.

Besides, RHEL already contains a package set that spans today's Core and
Extras.  Exim is an example.  It's in RHEL, and it's in Extras.  Let the
engineers at Red Hat decide what to put in RHEL.  They seem to be doing
a fine job already.

I suspect it will be just another spin of the Fedora package tree like
Desktop or Server that is then further stabilised so not much
different to now. Most of the stuff that's happening in Fedora is just
as relevant to rhel as it is fedora.

Peter

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux