On Friday 05 January 2007 4:28 am, Michael Wiktowy wrote: > I don't think it is descriminatory at all. I do. Please take what follows in a light mood, at least I did. > Actually, what would be consistent would be for the Gnome community to > name something "This does Foo" that has functionality Foo and the KDE > community to name something "KBar" that has the functionality Bar (and > I have a whole bunch of KStuff in my Gnome menu to prove it). Jesse's > original suggestion is more inline with that since KFedora is a bit > unweildy. I would call that more an historical accident that a planned strategy. Please don't forget as well gedit, gaim, gphoto... OTHO I use gwenview - Simple image viewer for KDE. > KDE folk seem to like their brand stuck on every piece of software > made for that desktop. Gnome folk tend not to go that route and name > their apps random obscure words and put localized descriptions in the > menus. To each their own. The plan (and practice) for KDE 4 is not to add a k preffix in a gratuitous way. FWIW the only new project that I remember now that starts with k, for KDE 4, is KDE 4 itself. :-) Certainly the existing projects will retain their names, it would be foolish to do it otherwise, but please don't put intention where it is not. > /Mike -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
