On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 22:06 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 11:24 +0900, Naoki wrote: > > This is going to sound really stupid but what the heck; The nice thing > > about the "core" and "extras" differentiation was you knew what was > > "core" and what was "extra". > > > > Without this distinction how does average Joe know that compiz is > > preferred over beryl, or that xmms is the option to Rhythmbox not the > > other way around? Just the definition inside comps.xml or something > > more complex? > > How does Joe user know this now? Good point, my idea of Joe user is obviously different the the "normal" My Joe user only ever uses the command line (servers). > They're just using the graphical tools > which (intentionally) don't show this. It's definitely an area that > could deal with improvement, but differentiation based on repo isn't > really the answer. There's a real opportunity to explore some new ways > of showing the defaults[1] Cool. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
