Re: Fedora 7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fedora 7
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:41:31 -0500
In-reply-to: <1167948109.21968.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20070104195032.GE4693@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070104205645.GA6194@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1167948109.21968.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> What happened to the firefox3/xulruner plans ?

Utterly dependent on upstream. I suppose it's worth checking on.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fedora 7
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot

References:
- Fedora 7
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: Fedora 7
  - From: Robert Scheck
- Re: Fedora 7
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot

Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 7
Next by Date: Re: Fedora 7
Previous by thread: Re: Fedora 7
Next by thread: Re: Fedora 7
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux