Re: musicpd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 19:10 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 00:09 +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
> > It might be that mpd is designed in such a way that it directly depends
> > on things we can't ship like an mp3 decoder. Thus it needs to be in
> > Livna (one could argue that the clients then also should be in Livna).
> 
> Exactly the case, as I understand it. It needs libmad (MP3-decoding
> library) an includes an internal copy of it in the main source tarball.

surely this can be fixed; I assume all it needs is an ID tag reader, not
the actual sound decoding part. The ID tag stuff isn't patented, only
the sound encoding/decoding, so in principle I'd think that such a
program could be fully in Extras, even though it might mean a bit of
surgery on the upstream tarbal ;(

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux