Re: To NX or not to NX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: To NX or not to NX
From: Ralf Ertzinger <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:36:46 +0100
In-reply-to: <20070103160724.GC680902@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: [NDC] :)
References: <1167812088.3567.9.camel@sonlaptop> <20070103121346.3478530a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070103160724.GC680902@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi.

On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:07:24 -0600, Chris Adams wrote

> That is not correct: both FC6-release and FC6-updates have
> kernel-PAE.i686.

Ah, indeed. I stand corrected.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Re: To NX or not to NX
  - From: Louis E Garcia II
- Re: To NX or not to NX
  - From: Ralf Ertzinger
- Re: To NX or not to NX
  - From: Chris Adams

Prev by Date: Re: DPI in intel modesetting driver
Next by Date: Re: DPI in intel modesetting driver
Previous by thread: Re: To NX or not to NX
Next by thread: Re: To NX or not to NX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux