> We tried doing so with an FC5 test release, but things didn't go so well > so we reverted back for the final. wasn't that when SMP and PAE were still tied together ? (smp I can believe not going well :) > CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G also isn't that > great for laptops. actually it doesn't matter at all; if the cpu can do NX it can do PAE. The pM PAE issue is only for pre-NX cpus > The work really needs to get done so that pae can be done at runtime, > much like smp alternatives lets us do for smp. Separate kernels is > _always_ a losing battle for someone ;-) oh I buy that.. however it's NotThatEasy(tm). Even that other OS doesn't do it ;) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
