On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 11:29 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 20:15 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > According to [1] and [2], the latest mach64 mesa (6.5.x) driver is
> > considered secure.
> > Could it be possible to implant the mach64.* code into the kernel source
> > (from drm) and enable mach64_dri in the mesa spec?
> > (I can live with the missing mach64.ko kernel module; However, having to
> > rebuild mesa on a PII366 every time a new mesa package is released to
> > fc6-updates is a -huge- pain in the backside)
>
> I'll look into this. Adding the DRI driver is no problem, but the DRM
> isn't upstream yet last I checked.
>
> - ajax
>
AFAIK the updated DRM has yet to be integrated into the main trunk.
I may be wrong, though.
Either way, if you can enable the mach_64.drv (Patch attached) I'll be
-very- grateful.
- Gilboa
--- mesa.spec.old 2006-12-19 13:42:36.000000000 +0200
+++ mesa.spec 2006-12-19 13:42:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
%if %{with_dri}
install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/dri
-for f in i810 i915 i965 mga r128 r200 r300 radeon savage sis tdfx unichrome; do
+for f in i810 i915 i965 mga mach64 r128 r200 r300 radeon savage sis tdfx unichrome; do
so=%{_lib}/${f}_dri.so
test -e $so && install -m 0755 $so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/dri
done
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
