On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:53 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:43:40PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > So, the entire thing boils down to "I don't like the g-conf storage > > format?" (I'm honestly asking here.) > > Here's another one. On my FTP server box, where it would be nice to have > convenient power management settings, I currently have no reason whatsoever > to have installed The GConf2 package needs to be split up. Near as I can tell these: > ORBit2, > libIDL, are actual requirements of the GConf2 system. These: > atk, fontconfig, freetype, gtk2, > libjpeg, > libpng, libtiff, pango, xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL, or xorg-xll-libs. are all requirements of what appears to be a diagnostic tool. If /usr/libexec/gconf-sanity-check-2 was in a subpackage we wouldn't have any of these dependencies. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
