Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 11:52:59AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> one thing that would be nice is if the cpu microcode data would actually > move from microcode_ctl to hwdata; the program almost never gets updated > but the microcode file gets updated every few months
Indeed. I've been doing some work on microcode_ctl lately, having taken it over recently - I'm ok with the idea of splitting the microcode itself out into another package, but that package is not hwdata.
hwdata is noarch though. Including x86 microcode data on all arches would be a bit crap.
Yep. Though if people (and Intel?) think it's a good idea, I can split it out into another package for ease of updating...any word on whether greater microcode changelog data is forthcoming? :-)
Jon. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
